Seismic Reservoir Characterization
|Dr Sagar Ronghe (DownUnder GeoSolutions, Perth, Australia)|
|1 or 2 days|
|Geophysics – Reservoir Characterization|
|5 or 10 CPD points|
2D 3D AMPLITUDE DEPTH CONVERSION IMPEDANCE INTEGRATION INTERPRETATION INVERSION LITHOLOGY ROCK PHYSICS
Well and seismic data can be integrated to predict lithology and fluid, quantify reservoir properties, identify leads and help risk prospects. This course provides an introduction to the concepts and application of quantitative seismic interpretation including statistical rock physics analysis and modeling.
This course discusses reservoir characterization as it applies to all stages of oil and gas field activity: from reconnaissance, through exploration and appraisal, to focused reservoir characterization during field development. As more data become available the options for QI increase. Workflows should be fit-for-purpose given project objectives and data availability. Reservoir characterization methodologies spanning qualitative attributes, inversion, probabilistic lithology and fluid predictions and the quantification of reservoir property distributions are presented. These include well log calibrated amplitude and AVA interpretations, stack rotations and deterministic and stochastic inversion. The importance of petrophysics and rock physics calibration as a foundation for all of these methods is highlighted.
The course also discusses seismic velocity modeling: the smooth merging of multiple 2D and or 3D velocity fields into a consistent 3D volume; and the calibration of seismic velocities to well data for accurate time-to-depth conversion. Depth conversion of seismic data and derived properties are important for facilitating well planning and field development decisions as well as for quantitative result interpretations.
Upon completion of the course, participants will gain fundamental knowledge of the concepts, applications and benefits of multiple reservoir characterization techniques. They will be introduced to the importance of petrophysics and rock physics in establishing well-to-seismic calibration and in providing the framework for results interpretation. Participants will obtain an understanding of the data conditioning requirements for quantitative interpretation work and an appreciation of how to review results for quality and consistency.
Introduction to seismic reservoir characterisation:
Overview and types; qualitative and quantitative; available workflow options and applications.
Statistical Rock Physics:
Importance of well data consistency and conditioning; petrophysics for quantitative interpretation; introduction to rock physics; wireline end-member picks and trends; stochastic forward modelling of trends to understand the population behaviour of the data and to assess depth dependencies; case study examples.
Amplitude and AVA:
Reflectivity and seismic concepts; secant amplitude interpretation for lithology and fluid distributions; AVA classifications and analysis; seismic conditioning for AVA work; case study examples.
Concepts of weighted stacks and rotation angle curves towards determining lithology and/or fluid distributions; applicability to seismic data, AVA products and inversion derivatives; elastic and extended elastic impedance; case study examples.
Concepts, types and benefits; constrained absolute simultaneous inversion: workflow overview and results QC; probabilistic lithology and fluid predictions; implications of broadband seismic; case study examples.
Concepts; workflow overview; results and case study examples.
Concept of smooth merging (levelling) velocities within a 2D survey or between 2D and/or 3D surveys; geostatistical velocity scaling for optimal time-depth conversion through calibration to well data; case study examples.
Summary of QI workflows:
Overview of applicability of reservoir characterisation techniques during reconnaissance (AVA attributes and calibrated stack rotations), exploration & appraisal (relative and/or absolute simultaneous inversion), and focussed field development (stochastic inversion).
The course would benefit all technical staff in exploration and development who are interested in determining formation properties through seismic and log data integration.
Participants should have basic knowledge of seismic data and well logs.
About the instructor
Dr Sagar Ronghe specialises in Quantitative Interpretation integrating wireline and seismic data. He has over 20 years of experience in seismic reservoir characterisation. Sagar is a Geoscience Manager with DownUnder GeoSolutions, based in Perth, Australia. His educational qualifications comprise a Bachelors in Geological Oceanography from the University College of North Wales, UK, a Masters Distinction in Petroleum Geology and a PhD in Geophysics, both from the University of Aberdeen, UK. He began his career in 1996 as a Lecturer in Geophysics at the University Brunei Darussalam. In 2002, he joined Fugro Jason as a Project Geoscientist based in Kuala Lumpur, relocated to Perth in 2007 and was appointed Regional Technical Manager for Fugro Jason in 2012. Sagar has been with DownUnder GeoSolutions since 2013.
- Castagna, J.P., et.al., 1985. Relationships between compressional-wave and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks. Geophysics, 50:571-581.
- Gardner, G.H.F, et.al., 1974. Formation velocity and density - the diagnostic basics for structural traps. Geophysics, 39:770-780.
- Glinsky, M.E., et.al. 2005. Integration of uncertain subsurface information into multiple reservoir simulation models. The Leading Edge. October. 991-999.
- Lamont, M. G., Thompson, T. A. and Bevilaqua C., 2008, Drilling success as a result of probabilistic lithology and fluid prediction — A case study in the Carnarvon Basin, WA, APPEA Journal, 2008.
- Rutherford, S.R., and Williams, R.H. 1989. Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas sands. Geophysics. v.54., no. 6., pp. 680-688.
- Whitcombe, D., Connolly, P., Reagan, R., and Redshaw, T. (2002). Extended elastic impedance for fluid and lithology prediction. Geophysics, 67(1), 63-67.
Explore other courses under this discipline:
Instructor: Dr Leo Eisner (Seismik)
The goal of this class is to explain principles of microseismic monitoring ranging from single monitoring borehole to surface and near surface networks. This class focuses on understanding the measurements made in passive seismic, their use and their uncertainties. Attendees should be able to decide on the best type of microseismic monitoring, design it, and know what kind of processing is needed to achieve their goals. They will also understand the uncertainties in the microseismicity. They will be able to avoid interpretation of uncertain observations. No requirement on prior class is needed, although knowledge of hydraulic fracturing and seismology helps. The course will also discuss the latest developments in microseismicity from source mechanisms, through tomography and anisotropy to reservoir simulations, including pore pressure analysis. The course discusses also social and scientific aspects of (induced) seismicity related to oil and gas reservoir.
Instructor: Dr Enru Liu (ExxonMobil)
The ability to identify fracture clusters and corridors and their prevalent directions within many carbonates and unconventional resources (shale gas, tight gas and tight oil reservoirs) can have a significant impact on field development planning as well as on the placement of individual wells. The characterization of natural fractures is difficult and cannot be achieved by any single discipline or single measurement. Geophysics can identify spatial distributions of fractures and fracture corridors between wells and seismically-derived fracture information to complement (not compete with) other measurements, such as outcrops, core, FMI, cross-dipole and other fracture information. This course is an introduction to the fundamental concepts of seismic fracture characterization by introducing seismic anisotropy, equivalent-medium representation theories of fractured rock and methodologies for extracting fracture parameters from seismic data. With a focus on practical applications, three case studies are presented to demonstrate the applicability, workflow and limitations of this technology: a physical laboratory 3D experiment where fracture distributions are known, a Middle East fractured carbonate reservoir and a fractured tight gas reservoir.
Instructor: Mr Olav Inge Barkved (Petoro)
Time-lapse seismic surveys or 4D seismic provide snapshots of a producing hydrocarbon reservoir and its surroundings. The benefit of the technology in monitoring fluid and pressure changes and to point out bypassed oil or un-drained compartments has been well documented over the last 10–15 years. Still the technology is undergoing rapid development. This course will provide some context on what is driving the dynamic changes linked to producing a hydrocarbon reservoir and what we should expect to observe using seismic technologies in a varied geological setting. It will address key issues that impact the feasibility of time-lapse seismic and evaluate established methods. However, the focus will be on ‘new’ technologies, use of a permanent array, frequent seismic surveying and integration of the data. Examples from the Valhall field will be used extensively to illustrate the potential of seismic data and to articulate issues related to interpretation and integration. This will include data examples from marine towed 4D, frequent surveying using permanently installed sensors, in-well recordings and analysis of passive data, including micro seismicity. Use of seismic surveillance information to support reservoir management, new well delivery and base management will be a central part of the presentation.
Instructor: Prof. Martin Landrø (Norwegian University of Science & Technology)
The course discusses various methods for monitoring subsurface injection of CO2. Specifically, the following topics will be covered:
- Rock physics related to injection of CO2 into porous rock
- Time-lapse seismic methods
- Gravity and electromagnetic methods
- Saturation and pressure effects
- Early detection of leakage
- Mapping overburden geology and identification of potential weakness zones
- Field examples
- Well integrity issues
- Using gas leakage as a proxy to study potential leakage of CO2
- Laboratory experiments of CO2 flooding including acoustic measurements
Instructor: Prof. Serge Shapiro (Freie Universitaet Berlin)
Stimulations of rocks by fluid injections (e.g., hydraulic fracturing) belong to a standard reservoir-development practice. Productions of shale oil, - shale gas, - heavy oil, - geothermal energy require broad applications of this technology. The fact that fluid injection causes seismicity (including microseismicity and, sometimes, significant induced earthquakes) has been well-established for several decades. Waste water injection into rocks, large-scale water reservoir constructions and underground carbon sequestrations are other examples of potentially seismogenic fluid impact on geologic structures. Understanding and monitoring of fluid-induced seismicity is necessary for hydraulic characterization of reservoirs, for assessments of reservoir stimulation results and for controlling seismic risk of fluid injections and production. The course provides systematic quantitative rock-physical and geomechanical fundamentals of all these aspects of the fluid-induced seismicity.
Instructor: Dr Dario Grana (University of Wyoming)
Integrated reservoir modeling workflows provide a set of techniques to create three-dimensional numerical earth models in terms of elastic, petrophysical and dynamic properties of the rocks at different time steps during exploration and production. The course focuses on the quantification of uncertainty in the data, in the physical models and in the predictions in reservoir modeling workflows. Topics include uncertainty quantification in seismic reservoir modeling, geostatistical reservoir simulations, fluid flow modeling, and reservoir monitoring. The link between uncertainty quantification and decision-making will be introduced through decision-making theory. The course will include demonstrations of the methodologies on real case applications.