Geostatistics for Seismic Data Integration in Earth Models
|Prof. Olivier Dubrule (Imperial College London, United Kingdom)|
|1 or 2 days|
|Geophysics – Integrated Geophysics|
|5 or 10 CPD points|
DEPTH CONVERSION FILTERING INTERPOLATION INTERPRETATION INVERSION MAPPING SPECTRAL ANALYSIS VELOCITIES
In recent years the use of geostatistics has spread from the world of reservoir characterization to that of velocity analysis, seismic inversion, uncertainty quantification, and more generally to that of seismic data integration in earth models. Nevertheless, many geoscientists still regard geostatistics as little more than a statistical black box. By explaining the concepts and applications, this course clarifies the benefits of geostatistics and helps spread its use.
The course covers the use of geostatistics for interpolation (kriging, etc.), heterogeneity modeling (conditional simulation), uncertainty quantification, and data integration (cokriging, geostatistical inversion, etc.). A variety of applications and examples are presented, including velocity mapping, construction of realistic heterogeneity models, and seismic data integration in stochastic earth models. The relationships between geostatistics and approaches more familiar to geophysicists, such as filtering or Bayesian methods, are also discussed, without entering into mathematical details. A number of case studies are presented, covering examples from various parts of the world.
The short-course presentation provides an overview of basic concepts and applications. The course notes provide a support to the course and further extend some of the more technical considerations.
As a result of attending this course, geoscientists will better understand how geostatistics fits into their workflow, what tools and techniques they should use depending on the problem at hand, and what added value may result from its use. More specifically, after attending the course, geoscientists will be able to:
- Define the right variogram to use in order to quantify their geological knowledge
- Recognize and discuss the main assumptions that were made in a given geostatistical study
- Interpret the results of a geostatistical heterogeneity modeling exercise, whether based on kriging or conditional simulation
- Choose among the various geostatistical modeling methods proposed by earth modeling software
Part 1: What does the Variogram mean? Ordinary Kriging, External Drift Kriging and Collocated Cokriging for combining seismic and well data, Factorial Kriging for filtering seismic data.
Part 2: Monte-Carlo Simulation, Conditional Simulation, Geostatistical Inversion and Earth Model Uncertainty Quantification.
Geoscientists (including geologists, earth modelers, petrophysicists, geophysicists and reservoir engineers) who have been exposed to applications of geostatistics but would like to improve their understanding.
Very basic statistical knowledge, and ideally some exposure to existing geostatistical software and applications.
About the instructor
Olivier Dubrule obtained a PhD Degree in Petroleum Geostatistics at Ecole des Mines de Paris in 1981. He then worked for Sohio Petroleum Company in the USA (1982-1986), Shell International in The Netherlands (1986-1991) and, since 1991, he has been with Elf and Total, working in France, the UK and Qatar. Dubrule was Manager of the Total Geoscience Research Centre in Aberdeen (UK) (2004-2008) and of the Total Research Centre Qatar (2008-2011). He was VP Geoscience Training and Technical Image in Pau (France) (2012-2014). Dubrule is currently seconded by Total as Visiting Professor at Imperial College London (UK).
Olivier Dubrule has authored many papers in the field of geostatistics and earth modelling. In 1991, he received the President's prize of the International Association of Mathematical Geology, for "Outstanding Contribution to Mathematical Geology by an individual 35 years or younger". He organized and chaired a number of events organized by SPE, EAGE, SEG or AAPG. Dubrule is the author of AAPG Course Notes Series #38 "Geostatistics in Petroleum Geology", and editor (with E. Damsleth) of "Petroleum Geostatistics" a Special Issue of EAGE's Petroleum Geoscience Journal, published in 2001.He was the SEG/EAGE DISC (Distinguished Instructor Short Course) in 2003 and President of EAGE (European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers) in 2004-2005. His book “Geostatistics for Seismic Data Integration in 3-D Earth Models” was translated in Russian and Farsi.
Explore other courses under this discipline:
Instructor: Prof. Tariq Alkhalifah (KAUST)
The course starts by introducing the fundamentals of full-waveform inversion (FWI) starting from its basic definition. It focuses on the model update issues and provides analysis of its probable success in converging to a plausible model. In the course we will discuss the many challenges we face in applying FWI on seismic data and introduce modern day proposed solutions to these challenges. The focus of the course will be on FWI applied to anisotropic media. As a result, the course will also introduce anisotropy, its optimal parametrization and wavefield simulation in such media. Practical multi-parameter inversion for anisotropic parameters requires an optimal FWI setup. We will discuss such a setup, which includes the proper parametrization of the medium and data access scheme necessary for a potential convergence to a plausible anisotropic model.
Instructor: Dr Gerard Schuster (KAUST)
This one-day course is designed for a broad range of seismic researchers, data processors, and interpreters working in the petroleum industry. The course teaches the principles of seismic interferometry, ambient noise seismology and their applications to surface seismic, VSP, and OBS data. The ultimate objectives are to enable geophysicists to evaluate the potential of seismic interferometry in uniquely solving their problems.
Instructors: Prof. Evgeny Landa (Tel Aviv University) and Dr Tijmen Jan Moser (Moser Geophysical Services)
Diffractions have been identified as the key seismic manifestation of fractures and other small-scale reservoir heterogeneities. This two-day course will present the current state-of-the-art of diffraction technology and put this in context by a review of its past developments. The course will cover both forward diffraction modeling and diffraction imaging. Case studies of diffraction imaging will be presented covering applications in seismic exploration and other areas of geoscientific interest.
Instructor: Dr Ruben Martinez (Reservoir Geoscience)
This course has two main segments. In the first segment, the participant will understand the basic concepts behind the tools commonly employed in velocity model building and depth migration.
In the second segment, the participant will learn how to use these tools for building velocity models and generate seismic images in depth using practical work flows for a variety of complex geologic scenarios. At the end of the course, an overview of the emerging depth imaging technologies is presented.
Instructor: Prof. Evgeny Landa (Tel Aviv University)
While depth imaging play an increasing role in seismic exploration, data analysis and imaging in time domain play an important role. Moreover, for complex models that request the use of prestack depth migration, time imaging usually constitutes a key first step. The proposed course discusses: a) data analysis and imaging based on new procedures such as Multifocusing and Common Reflection Surface; b) diffraction Imaging based on diffracted energy targeting to image small scale subsurface objects; c) imaging without precise knowledge of the subsurface velocity model (path summation); d) pitfalls and challenges of seismic inversion.
Instructor: Mr Etienne Robein (ERT)
The course will present in simple terms (cartoons rather than equations!) the principle of different techniques in each class of methods (Kirchhoff, Beam Migrations, WEM, RTM), while pointing out their respective merits and limitations. Similarities and differences between Time- and Depth-Imaging will be briefly reminded. In parallel, special emphasis is put on methods used to build the necessary anisotropic velocity models. Both Ray-based techniques (linear and non-linear tomography) and wavefield extrapolation-based ones, including Full Waveform Inversion, are addressed.
Instructor: Prof. Dr Dries Gisolf (Delft Inversion)
This two-day course will start with an introduction and a short recap on complex integral transforms (Fourier, Laplace, F/K and linear Radon). Followed by topics on: - The acoustic wave equation in inhomogenous media - Integral representations of the acoustic wave equation; Kirchhoff-Rayleigh and the Scattering Integral (Lippmann-Schwinger) - The AVO data model; Zoeppritz reflection coefficients - Linear inversion of AVO data including regularisation; synthetic and real data examples - The non-linear data model for inversion; data equation and object equation; iterative, multiplicatively regularised inversion - Applications based on an elastic full-wavefield non-linear data model; realistic synthetic reservoir study, real data case studies including low-frequency model extraction and seismic-to-well matching. Synthetic time-lapse example.
Instructor: Mr Piet Gerritsma (Gerritsma Geophysical Training and Consultancy)
The process of migration, whereby a proper image in time or depth of the subsurface is obtained, is directly related with the velocity model that both serves as input for the migration process as well as is the result of such a migration. Therefore migration and velocity model building are intimately related processes and often applied in an iterative mode. This course gives an overwiew with theory and implementation of the representative migration algorithms as well as of the multitude of ways to build and update subsurface velocity models.
Instructor: Prof. Dr Dries Gisolf (Delft Inversion)
This course presents a systematic approach to imaging of acoustic reflection data and the extraction of media property information from the image amplitudes, based on wave theory. Although the approach is valid for a wide range of acoustical frequencies and applications, there is a bias towards seismic imaging.